Book Review: A Doll’s House
I have come to the conclusion that I need to read a play that doesn't descend into the fiery depths of misogynistic hell. Because wtf?!?!? We can take a quick deep dive into why this book is considered a classic, sure. Ibsen is world-renowned for his works in the theatre. But my god, this play was something else. Sure, in a modern day reading of this play it is feminist AS FUCK. But I seem to be reading plays where the male characters are nothing but mysogynistic assholes who dream of the white picket fence and treat the women around them as objects for their “affections”.
What intrigued me about this play was how much of a sensation it caused when it was first performed in Norway circa. 1879. It was seen as a challenge to societal norms of Norway and beyond. Did Ibsen see this play to argue the point of injustice against women? Not sure, or at least it isn't clear that it was. But rest assured, the covenant of marriage was seen as a holy, sacred, a beautiful institution. Not according to the play, it isn't. Boy, does Ibsen question the roles women play in the house and the home. Also, their intelligence, which is a little insulting - but apparently that was the norm in late 19th-century Norway (and beyond, let's be real).
The play mostly focuses on four central characters. Nora, the wife, is seemingly content with her marriage. Torvald, her affectionate husband. Kristine Linde, the poor, impoverished and widowed friend of Nora’s. Lastly, Nils Krogstad, who comes across as a scoundrel but really is a misunderstood villain and the long-lost lover of Kristine. I will admit there is an interesting commentary on what is considered ‘unconditional love’ and that it is not guaranteed if you are married. Torvald is a good example of this in this play - he dotes on Nora, whilst simultaneously putting her down. She is suffocated by the expectations that she must stay home, look after he children and see to the whims of her husband. Torvald’s rigorous adherence to these societal norms leads him to ignore the love his wife holds and the sacrifices she has made to ensure his happiness. It is his downfall. Honestly, he is a massive damp squib and not who Nora needs in the end.
I do understand why this is considered a classic and why it still works and resonates today. I hate to see it, but the rise of Tate and his cronies, as well as Trumo being back in power, has lowered the freedoms of women. This play will rise in importance, and I would love it if one day this play were seen as old-fashioned and so far removed from the modern reality without the pressures of societal expectations.